A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world

by eqreBORN



Bénéficiez de 20 % de réduction sur un abonnement premium à Brilliant – à vie ! Il suffit de s’inscrire à Cold Fusion qui a fait irruption en 1989 avec l’annonce que les chercheurs Fleischmann et Pons avaient créé de l’énergie grâce à un processus chimique qui induit la fusion à température ambiante. Lorsque personne d’autre n’a été en mesure de reproduire leurs découvertes, la fusion à froid est devenue l’un des plus grands fiascos scientifiques depuis des décennies. Mais certains pensent qu’ils étaient sur la bonne voie, et que leur méthode pourrait être la clé pour changer le monde. Liens vers des articles et des vidéos ci-dessous. Soutenez-moi sur Patreon ! Obtenez des t-shirts ringards cool chez Intéressé par une Tesla ? Utilisez mon lien de parrainage et bénéficiez de remises et d’avantages : devenez membre de la chaîne et accédez à des diffusions en direct et à du contenu exclusifs ici : Suivez-moi partout ! Instagram : Snapchat : Facebook : Twitter : LIENS LIENS LIENS : MinutePhysics – excellente répartition de l’animation de fusion catalysée par Muon montrant la méthode de fusion à froid activée par réseau : Une vidéo Pro-LENR : Une archive des études de recherche LENR :.

READ  1. Technology and Entrepreneurship Overview technology entrepreneurship

Table of Contents

READ  B-ROLL Technology technology b roll

Images related to the topic a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

Search related to the topic A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

#Technology #Change #World #Exists #Answers #Joe
A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe
a technology that would change the world
Vous pouvez trouver plus d’informations utiles ici: voir plus ici
Vous pouvez trouver plus d’informations utiles ici: voir plus ici

You may also like

25 comments

Duchess 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

Science is the modern worlds religion. and its priests are just as closed minded and arrogant.

Reply
SolarWinds AuroraBorealis 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

Hey Joe, thanks for all the eye opening vids. Question, do you make your living on YouTube or do you have a profession other than Answers with Joe? We'd be curious to know. Thanks!

Reply
Jason J 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

its sad that the scientific community would just give up on it bc 2 ppl are assholes. bummer. you never know.

Reply
King Nekogon 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

"Junk science or worth exploring?"
Focus on making Muons easier (cheaper) to make, or prevent them from sticking. Yeet the lattice bs out the window.

Reply
Christopher Caldwell 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

Imagine trying to explain something like GPS (which depends on the speed of light) to someone who thought Newton's Laws were "the final answer".

What it comes down to is "have you done the work?" If somebody comes to you with this really cool theory/idea AND can show you how they got there, all power to them.

It's really hard for me to declare that cold fusion is impossible with particles apparently going back and forth in time… but I'd want to see the chain of events leading up such an extraordinary claim.

Reply
Robert Deskins 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

Just remember archeology is NOT science the same way chemistry & physics is

Reply
LordPadriac 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

NASA won't touch emdrive no matter how promising it could be they're too regimented to take actual scientific risks anymore. Maybe it's a pipe dream but it's something that can only be tested in space. I think if someone with their very own private space fleet were to launch a study into and it played out…forget about going to see little green men or settling colonies – there's still too much other work that needs to be done like some way to mimic gravity. If the emdrive was tested and it worked and was perfected; whatever company did that would own energy and be the ONLY name in clean energy from that point on. If you have an engine that takes no power but generates movement then you have a way to spin a dynamo and beam that energy via laser or microwave back to Earth for use.

Reply
0x777 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

Cold fusion is about 20 years out.

Granted, it has been 20 years out for about half a century…

Reply
John Guerra 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”
― Socrates

Reply
Arash Arfaee 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

I can see one exception to your thinking ways. There are people that although they might not realize it, it is their jobs to force themselves to think differently. Scientists themselves or at leat those who do something big, usually start from not accepting things as is.
But in general, I agree with you. I can have the luxury of doubting everything around my own speciality, but I trust the rest to what majority of scientists can agree on them. Which Btw, at best 30% somewhat accurate and in time most of them will be discredited or replaced with a new version that many time is an improved version of the old views. I don't see a way to do better than this while one keeps studying and thinking and growing that might lead to some wisdom seeing things a bit better starting seeing things. And get back to the right side of the DK graph in a different level! 🤔

Reply
Whine 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

What most people don't know is that a Cold Fusion machine was invented, but it was stolen by the infamous PAYDAY gang for a certain right-leaning senator backed by a large oil conglomerate.

Reply
Vinny Lamoureux 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

It's worth the risk cuz the people who do it are so wedded to whatever it is that they might go ok nuts otherwise.

Reply
Stoney's Dead 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

I think skepticism can lead to cynicism and that's what we need to avoid. But as long as your skepticism is applied appropriately so that it doesn't squash creativity and thinking out of the box- it's a good thing I think. The w ay I look at it there's no way you can study it all- at some point if you're going to be educated and informed you have to take someone's word for it. At least when it comes to science I know and understand the means by which they arrived at their opinions- the scientific method. In reality I'm trusting that method- not them or their authority. This is why I feel it's super important that we hold these ppl accountable to following that method always- never deviating or letting bias skew the outcome any more than what's absolutely unavoidable. This means policing the way papers are published, the way labs operate, how experiments are carried out, etc. Because like any other institution science is not immune to the almighty influence of the dollar.

Reply
Ed Reusser 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

I wish you would have talked more about the lack of neutrons and the lack of other evidence that fusion took place. And yes I believe that this should be pursued. The fact that it works so well with muons means that the amount of energy required is in the same magnitude as that required. It may be possible to modify the substrate to get better results.

Reply
pedro pedrohan 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

8:22 i thought it was the other 1989

Reply
MoneyMakerUDV 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

And now, 2 years later, we are pretty close to implement this, at least progress is huge

Reply
Masternuckable 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

Fusion is at 97-98% efficiency at this point. Uber exciting!

Reply
Martin Samuelian 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

Joe, what about Max Planck's believes on consciousness? ps: you are very good at what you do. Well done

Reply
Joseph Stokes 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

GRAMMAR! _ Joe, I'm back! One cannot have something "between" three people! It is "among" when there are more than two!! Come on, this is sixth grade grammar!!

Reply
Christopher Zenga 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

Can you cut the opening to this and reupload for today’s world?

Reply
Jiminy Cricket 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

@2:14 – Had to see if this was a 2021 statement lol.

Reply
Rigo Torres 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

is Joe Scott a Scientist?

Reply
SELECTED SCIENCE SCIEZARD 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

but what if . . .

Reply
Neil Lizotte 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

I love your videos, but not this one, needs much more research

Reply
Eric Velasquez 02/12/2021 - 1:39 Sáng

I though Elisabeth Shue and Val Kilmer already discovered cold fusion

Reply

Leave a Comment